“Font Choice? Well that is definitely a matter of taste”
Design is our livelihood and we often ask ourselves how many of our projects are based on the science of design and how much of our output is simply just a matter of taste. Especially when it comes to topic of font and font design, some would say it’s all about our preferences.
To clarify this question, we need to digress a bit, to be precise to the place where we first need to define these terms:
How do you perceive these messages?
Not only are each of these statements really bad. The font implied that it could be a statement of a specific company who use these fonts in their corporate design… so again for the record, fonts are not a matter of taste at this point, but a matter of association!
And further on the topic of taste theory
When customers talk about good design or about taste, they often say “can we make this a little Apple-y?” and they mean the plain, “functional” Apple design.
Apple has always cut everything that was unnecessary and did not contribute to a direct user experience. Hardly anyone says that a MacBook or an iPhone is ugly and why not? Because it is (again) purposeful and functional.
Considering the examples, I’ve already provided above, you should realize that fonts can trigger certain reactions or implications. They can override a competency or inspire confidence. They can immediately assign or connect and assure quick comprehension. Which means used correctly, they can convey a desired impression.
With the proliferation of digital fonts and the endless possibilities they have created, design teams often have the agony of choice.
Let’s take a look at a few fonts that are popularly used by various industries:
Yes, as I said: The agony of choice.